Fw: Joint Statement Regarding PIPA (S.968) & SOPA (HR 3261)

Joel Fritz willie_mctell@COMCAST.NET
Wed Jan 25 13:11:09 EST 2012

I'm late to the discussion, but I have to agree with you.  I realize
that piracy is a problem for the entertainment biz and for
independents.  I don't think these laws are the right way to deal with
the problem.  The entertainment biz has a long track record of trying to
deal with advances in technology that aid piracy through criminal
sanctions.  They ought to consider how successful they've been with this
approach so far. <g>  The only way to deal with technological advances
is to ask the question "How can we make money from this?"  Trying to
stop piracy isn't nearly as effective as figuring out ways to take the
profit out of piracy.  Much as it goes against my most basic beliefs,
I've gotta say that where money is concerned people are pretty darned smart.

Fritz Bros Tunes:  http://www.myspace.com/thefritzbrothers

On 1/21/2012 12:34 AM, Stan Erhart wrote:
> I received this statement from AFM a little while ago. The intent sounds good, but unfortunately for them/us, I think messing with the internet in the way that was intended is very dangerous. The free internet is bringing the world together in ways never seen before. If the govt, or others in authority, use dns servers to black out sites they suspect of breaking U.S. laws, it will lead down a very slippery path - and probably expensive legal battles that will bankrupt many "little people".
> The horse is out of the barn. In this day and age just about anybody, including Justin Bieber, could be charged with criminal activity. Maybe because they downloaded a movie, or an mp3, or because they sang along with a record, and uploaded it to youtube.
> There is a LOT of material on youtube that I would presume to be copyrighted. If I want to listen to a tune to learn, I look for it on youtube first. If I really like it, I'll buy it thru amazon (rather than convert the vid to mp3), because the quality is much better. But the point is that there is a lot of original recordings of copyrighted material on youtube. So I'm sure google is worried about how this could affect their business. It's not just about piracy from sites outside the U.S.
> Stan Erhart
> -----Original Message-----
> From: AFM<broadcast@afm.org>
> Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:43:46
> To: Stan Erhart<stan@erhart.net>
> Subject: Joint Statement Regarding PIPA (S.968)&  SOPA (HR 3261)
> January 20, 2012
> **Joint Statement from AFM, AFTRA, DGA, IATSE, IBT and SAG  Regarding
> the PROTECT IP Act (S. 968) and the STOP Online Piracy Act (HR 3261)**
>     The following statement was issued by the American Federation of
> Musicians (AFM), American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
> (AFTRA), Directors Guild of America (DGA), International Alliance of
> Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and
> Allied Crafts of the United States, Its Territories and Canada (IATSE),
> Screen Actors Guild (SAG), and International Brotherhood of Teamsters
> (IBT):
>        "We thank and commend Senators Reid, Leahy and Kyl as well as
> Congressmen Smith, Conyers, Goodlatte, Watt and Berman and all the other
> co-sponsors of the PROTECT IP Act and the Stop Online Piracy Act, who in
> the face of an onslaught of mistruths and great pressure to renege on
> their commitment, stood steadfast in their belief that the uniquely
> American creativity embodied in our country's films, TV programs and
> music deserves to be protected from illegal foreign profiteers.  We
> fought for this legislation because illegal Internet businesses that
> locate offshore expressly to elude US laws should not escape the very
> same rules of law that currently apply to illegal US websites – they
> should not be allowed to reap in profits if they knowingly sell or
> distribute illicitly gained content and goods which they had no role in
> creating or financing to the American consumer.
>      "We recognize that we are currently part of a complex and
> important debate about the future, not just of the Internet but also of
> creativity, the American economy, free expression, and a civil
> society.   We believe that the light should be being shined on every
> aspect of this discussion and on all of those who have a stake in it.
> We believe we should discuss what an unregulated 'free' Internet means
> for the future of content, just as we should also discuss the importance
> of an open Internet.
>    "We welcome this debate. We hope a new tone can be set and it is not
> one that turns our advocacy for this legislation into an implication
> that we promote censorship. Our commitment to the First Amendment is
> decades old and long established – it is a matter of public record
> from long before the word 'Internet' was part of anyone's vocabulary.
> If one truly embraces free expression, they do not take down the Library
> of Congress websites, the very symbol of our country's belief in
> knowledge and learning.  We would hope a new tone can be set that does
> not pit the creativity and innovation of our directors, actors,
> performers, craftspeople, and technicians against those innovators in
> other industries.  We hope a new tone can be set that does not include
> website attacks, blacklists, blackouts, and lies. We believe an Internet
> that does not allow outright stealing has to be the Internet of the
> future or all the promises it holds will be unrealized.
>      "We are committed to open debate. We are equally as committed to
> protecting our members' ability to create and to earn a living while
> doing so.  We will work with Chairmen Leahy and Smith to make both
> possible.”
> Click here (http://broadcast.afm.org/lt.php?c=369&m=266&nl=37&s=afc4682033984c602211a69e1239343d&lid=4046&l=-http--www.afm.org/uploads/file/SOPAPIPARelease.pdf) for a
> PDF copy of the press release.
> AFM Website (http://broadcast.afm.org/lt.php?c=369&m=266&nl=37&s=afc4682033984c602211a69e1239343d&lid=4041&l=-http--www.afm.org/) | Edit Member Profile
> (http://broadcast.afm.org/lt.php?c=369&m=266&nl=37&s=afc4682033984c602211a69e1239343d&lid=4042&l=-http--afm.org/settings) | AFM Facebook
> (http://broadcast.afm.org/lt.php?c=369&m=266&nl=37&s=afc4682033984c602211a69e1239343d&lid=4043&l=-http--www.facebook.com/afmorg) | AFM Twitter
> (http://broadcast.afm.org/lt.php?c=369&m=266&nl=37&s=afc4682033984c602211a69e1239343d&lid=4044&l=-http--www.twitter.com/MusiciansUnion) | AFM YouTube
> (http://broadcast.afm.org/lt.php?c=369&m=266&nl=37&s=afc4682033984c602211a69e1239343d&lid=4045&l=-http--www.youtube.com/MusiciansUnion)
> Copyright © 2011 American Federation of Musicians
> 1501 Broadway Suite 600 | New York, NY 10036
> You're receiving this email because you're a member, officer or
> otherwise affiliated with the American Federation of Musicians of the
> United States and Canada. If you've received this email in error or
> would like unsubscribe to future mailings, click here (http://broadcast.afm.org/box.php?nl=37&c=369&m=266&s=afc4682033984c602211a69e1239343d&funcml=unsub2).

Archives & web interface: http://listserv.nethelps.com/ARCHIVES/BLUES-L.HTML
- To contact the administrator, send an email addressed to: owner-BLUES-L@listserv.nethelps.com
- To unsubscribe, send a new email addressed to: listserv@listserv.nethelps.com, with the message: unsubscribe BLUES-L

More information about the Blues-l mailing list