Was Re: Maxed out....Kind of look; little "blues" real content?
Pete & Brenda Wulforst
Wed Jul 16 19:07:40 EDT 1997
Eventually, I hope one day people will applaud the effort than any musician
> puts into the whole process that starts by his learning how to play his
> instrument of choice which then allows him to communicate those things that
> he cannot put into words.
> In fact, I hereby applaud all musicians of all types of music and the
> efforts that they expended in order to achieve the results that they share
> with us the listeners, whomever we are or wherever we are.
This is what it's all about!! I arrived at this plateau relatively late in life, so I
guess I should be more patient with folks on this list and elsewhere who are quick to
dismiss a performer in any genre with a "SO and SO sucks" or "That's nothin; I could do
that". Let's here ya! Whoops, there I go again.
After 33 years of playing guitar and listening to a wide variety of jazz, blues and
rock, I admire anyone who can play and or sing something and make it sound "good", by
which I mean just that : if its a 2-chord vamp or a sophiticated bebop tune with
multiple chord substitutions, etc.
This is not to say that everyone's on the same level - of course not. However, in
addition to listening music that challenges me and makes me feel guitaristically
inadequate, I listen to al lot of music made by players with far less technique than me.
Why? cause I really like the way it sounds, of course. It's apples and oranges. I
don't get the same thing from Big Jack Johnson or John Lee Hooker that I get from Alan
Holdsworth or Scott Henderson, but I need it all.
This group being what it is, I suppose it is natural for folks to want to try and define
the boundaries of blues, as they see them. Fine, but you'll still be arguing about it
when I 'm too feeble to type or play the guitar. And, why must some folks be so
judgemental? I've gone on too long, but hope in rambling I've made the point I set out
More information about the Blues-l